These came from the book said some of the paint jobs cost $15,000 and had to be repeated every 3 months as the cat’s hair grows out. Must be nice to have $60,000 a year just to keep your cat painted!
Some do look nice, but some are just looking funny. Anyway, I think it should really remain natural. Cats look so much nicer naturally than putting paint on them.
What do you think ?
Categories
Recent Posts
- 26 Really Creative and Innovative Products
- How to make key with an Ice-cream Stick
- Why bicycle shorts are always black
- Amazing dog without 2 legs
- McDonald’s Menu Around the World
- The Most Expensive Cell Phone - 1.3 Million
- 10 Very Creative Cake Designs
- Sickness that turns out (really) ugly
- Weapon Factory - How it looks like from the inside
- When Photo Are Taken WIthout Flash
- Very Innovative Ideas for living
- Amazing Towel
- Super Cow
- Luxury Jail in Australia
- Amazing Japanese Hair Combover
Recent Comments
- riskAlipari on Funny Signboards Found In United Kingdom
- excireTed on Funny Signboards Found In United Kingdom
- Rockerbaby on From Egg to Chick
- JAY on World’s 10 Largest Shopping Mall
- :( ```dead````): on 5 Most Handsome Men in the world
```dead````)::
6 Responses for "Cats Painting"
You people need your f—— heads examined! In my opinion, you idiots should not own cats as you fail to appreciate the true beauty of these animals. If you are looking for artwork, buy a stuffed animal and dye it. You have no right to subject these beautiful creatures to your narcissicism. Hopefully the PITA will stop you from ever hurting another cat. I refuse to believe this is safe and if your cat could speak, do you think they would agree to this kind of vandalism done to their elegant fur? No two cats are alike - why can’t you appreciate the natural beauty cat’s possess? Here’s a suggestion - how about getting a tatoo for yourself and leave the cats alone.
lol @ skane! those cats sure seemed to be “hurting” from all that paint. leave it to some backwater catloving hick to complain about some pretty interesting art.
i imagine if it hurt the cats, the owners, who seemed to very much enjoy their animals, wouldn’t have it done. perhaps this is why it costs 15,000 each time, because the ink is non toxic, yet permanent.
i think it kicked ass.
I am sorry but it doesnt seem right period, yes it is a very unique form of expression. But I do not believe that, that is safe for a cats fur let alone thier skin. I agree with Skane I hope PETA puts a stop to this. Lastly, Allen, people have moeny to waste and those people waste money on dead animal furs that are dyed to thier likings, I am sure they do not care what is happening to those beautiful cats.
Very cool. Would they put a tan camo on my springer spaniel? He would hide from the ducks better, so I could shoot, kill and eat them. So yes, I would paint my dog so I have a better chance to shoot, kill, and eat birds. Ted Nugent would be proud.
I really liked this post, I agree with you completely!
is this a photoshop?
Leave a reply